R. Jagannathan has rightly said, “secularist have proved that what they care about is not justice, but their own vanity”. “India’s humbug secularists have personalized the definition of secularism for narrow political ends”. “Why is anyone who promotes Gujarat an instant target for secularists? This is ideological tyranny”.

Unfortunately in India, only those are counted as secular who speak for or create show to speak for minority.

Can anyone explain who is communal and who is secular? Of course congress has proved pseudo-secular in many occasions earlier. But, this time they have proved communal and also once again proved their dirty vote bank tactics/politics. Every one blame or rather fashion to blame BJP as communal party, but congress is also communal party. How?

They think that by highlighting Gujarat riots on regular interval and this is what they are doing since 2002, congress may not get room in Gujarat but they think of getting benefit in the rest of the India. Some congress leader even told this earlier. By this way actually they spread communalism, isn’t it? But, they forget one thing. You can fool the people for the couple of occasion, but not all the time.

Looking to the history since independence, there are so many violence occurred even bigger than Gujarat and even some of them state sponsored also, but no SC intervene, no SIT formed, no outcry by so called secularist and Human activist. Even in Gujarat also in 1985, much larger scale state sponsored violence was their but no one even noticed that. What kind of justice this is going on?

Congress is asking from Bachhan to clarify his stand on 2002 riots. This shows the way of congress thinking that riots can be justifiable and this shows the communal mind of congress actually. It’s question of common sense that any form of riots communal/non-communal are always condemnable. So, what’s the reason to seek clarification from Bachhan or anyone else?